Self-close vs title company, decided on paper
Lesson 1 of 6 · Close it
1 · Learn the move · Comparison matrix
On a small cash tract the question comes up every time: close it yourself with an attorney-drawn deed, or pay a title company to run it. The decision usually gets made on a feeling about fees. A comparison matrix makes it get made on paper, with the same rows for each route and a cell for every cost, risk and unknown. The trap is that a model asked this question will happily fill the fee cells with 'typical' amounts and tell you self-closing is common. Neither is true of your deal. The only fees in the matrix are the ones on quotes you pasted, and whether a non-attorney may close in your state is a question the matrix routes to an attorney licensed there, never a cell it answers.
Compare two ways to close this tract: self-close with an attorney-drawn deed, or a title company. Same rows for both: what it does, what it costs, what risk stays with me, what is still unknown. Costs come only from the quotes I pasted; anything unquoted reads [NEEDS: quote]. Do not tell me which route is legal in my state. [contract] [quotes]
2 · Your turn. You write the prompt
You have a signed contract on a 6.2-acre tract in Harrow County at a cash price, an emailed quote from a title company, and a quote from an attorney to draw the deed. The seller wants it done in two weeks. Write the prompt that lays both routes side by side without inventing a single fee or a legal answer.
Write the prompt for this scenario as given, or swap in a real one from your own work. The score works the same either way.
Remember: the AI sees only your prompt, not this page. If the situation isn't in your prompt, it doesn't exist.
Optional. These shape the output when you run your prompt below, not your score.