Use eligibility (short-term rental, accessory units) from the ordinance only

1 · Learn the move · Constraints + negative instructions

Eligibility for a short-term rental or an accessory unit is where land buyers most often buy a rumour. A neighbour runs one, a rental site shows three nearby, the seller says the town allows them. None of that is a record. The ordinance is, along with any registration rule it points to and any recorded covenant on the parcel, and each of the three can say no on its own. So this lesson is built out of what the model must not use. It must not infer eligibility from nearby activity, which may be unregistered or older than the rule. It must not supply a typical cap, separation distance or occupancy rule. It must not treat silence in the ordinance as permission. What remains is narrow and valuable: for each use, the ordinance's conditions quoted, the parcel facts that meet or miss them, and the record still needed. Covenants are a title question, and a parcel can clear the ordinance and still be barred by a deed restriction nobody pasted.

For each use below, list the ordinance's conditions word for word, then what my parcel records show against each. Do NOT infer eligibility from neighbouring rentals or what the seller said. Do NOT supply any cap, distance or occupancy rule not quoted. Silence in the ordinance reads [NEEDS: the planner's written reading], never yes. [ordinance sections] [parcel records] [seller's claim]